Belief in God but not Religion Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Belief in God but not Religion - Essay Example Examples of religions include the Buddhists, Christians, and Muslims among others (Hesse 77). There is the need to belief in God and not religion because the two books; Siddhartha and The Little Philosophy Book gives different perspectives of religions. Siddhartha talks about a spiritual voyage of the main character who is Siddhartha, through four sections of life. Siddhartha was a son to Brahmin and aesthetic in the forest. He was described as a gambler, merchant and eventually a ferryman. At the end of the book, the wisdom of Siddhartha arrived at by the supposed character was a mixture of Buddhists and Hindu traditions (McClory 42). The Little Philosophy Book, on the other hand, talks about examination of individual-self, the earth, and the nature of truthand, putting across questions like, â€Å"why are we here?† â€Å"who are we?† and â€Å"how should we live?† the book begins by traveling around antique philosophy that varies from Socrates’ Greece, t o Vedic India, to Daoist, Confucian, and Buddhist China, and in the Middle East (Solomon 82). In essence, both books reflect on the aspect of religion where different people practice several beliefs and customs. For example, in Siddhartha, the main character was a gambler who lived in woods with his own way of life and in his quest for wisdom Siddhartha makes a false sacrifice (Hesse 77). His selfish actions made him have many arguments with his fellow old man, Ferryman. For example, Siddhartha portrayed his negligence and selfish actions when he was told by Ferryman to let his 12-year son to take care of himself in the woods and the world because his father was not being fair to him. Siddhartha had a mind-body problem, which made him portray his selfishness attitude. Throughout their lives in the forest, these people had their own religion, which combines the teachings and practices of Buddhists and Hindu. Note that Buddhism is a religion on its own while Hinduism is another religi on on its own. The practices and traditions of these two religions are different. Since, Siddhartha, Ferryman, Hesse and other people who lived in forest had a hybrid of the two religions of Hindu and Buddhist, it means their religion was also on its own (Hesse 64). Note that all of them believe to be worshipping God but their practices, customs and traditions are different. This means that belief should be dedicated to God and not religion because the world has several religions, which have distinct practices, and no religion believes on what the other religion believes in. The same concept is supported in the book The Little Philosophy Book which examines the concept of consciousness as par Descartes’ thought that, â€Å"I think, therefore I am†, phenomenological words that explain the issue of mind-body problem (Solomon 91). This book talks about God, spirituality, nature, freedom and responsibility, cosmology, morality and ethics. The book also explores the meaning of life and the function of philosophy in determining both life and happiness. All these concepts are connected to religion in the sense that they define the way of life of people and as mentioned, the practices in it indicate that the religions of China people was Buddhist, while Indians practiced Vedic as other practiced Confucianism (McClory 43). All these are examples of religions in both books and they clearly imply that people need to believe in God and not religion because there is no uniform custom in all the religions in the world. The spirituality of these religions also differs greatly due to the difference in believes. However, it should be clear that spirituality is the majestic and thoughtful fervors of life and a life lived

Comparative Public Sector Administration Assignment

Comparative Public Sector Administration - Assignment Example Based on Northouse's (2007) definition, of leadership — Leadership is a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal – we gather that a leader’s style of functioning can have significant implications for the employees as well as the goals. In examining the case of Albert Dunlap, we can identify how this seems to occur. Albert Dunlap served as the Chief Executive officer at Sunbeam Corporation using a managerial style that was both ruthless and rigorous. The emphasis seems to have been on profit-making; to the extent that ethical behavior was deeply compromised to that end. There is supposed evidence of tampering with the revenue books; which if true, would be evidence of a selfish motivation to the ruthless attempt at making profits. Such behavior shows a marked lack of consideration for the staff’s needs or their due. According to Blake and Mouton’s (1957) model, these are signs of low concern for people and a high concern for tasks. Such a pattern of leadership is described as the ‘Authoritarian Leadership. The Authoritarian leader is focused on the task to exclusion of the people involved in completing the task. In the case of Albert Dunlap, this ‘task’ was creating as much profit as possible, and siphoning much of it into personal desires. This kind of leader views people as means to an end, and communicates only what s/he believes is essential to the task.

Restoration & Recovery Plan Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words - 2

Restoration & Recovery Plan - Essay Example Interconnected capabilities of information systems allow system operators instant feedback from an inquiry. Moreover, their interconnectedness provides added resources as they provide links to other databases with critical information. For those with harmful intentions, the interconnectivity of public safety systems represents an opportunity. One vile or deleted piece of information can easily infiltrate and corrupt or lock an entire system’s operations and subsequently infect connected systems. It is believed that government systems may become targets of attack (Wilmot, 2004; Wilson, 2003). Instead of using explosives, terrorists may resort to the destructive effects of data packets. According to Lieutenant General Kenneth A. Minihan, groups harboring hostility towards the United States are currently developing â€Å"offensive information warfare capabilities† (Wilcot, 2004, p. 284) making government computers and information systems targets (Wilson, 2003). As a connected subsidiary of the federal government (SafirRosetti, 2006), the Fort Lauderdale Police Department of Florida FLPD and its information systems are equally susceptible to attacks. The Fort Lauderdale Police Department implements several strategies to combat imminent attacks against information systems; however, its strategies require added forethought and planning. Though the risks of information systems is known among systems operators, protection plans are far and few between. Scarce time is invested into the protecting systems. Wilcot (2004) points out the haphazard security of information systems: â€Å"In most agencies, security is relegated to someone in the information services (IS) department, who usually has many other duties.† (p 291) To ensure the safety of its information systems, FLPD relies on its staff (SafirRosetti, 2006) and the administrative department of the Risk Management Division (BCL). The person in charge of

Impact of eCommerce in Todays Business World Essay -- economic impact

In beginning this essay, I would like to state that E-commerce and stock trading has drastically affected the lives of many Americans and non-Americans worldwide. There are several effects from this technology and new system of buying and selling. I believe that one effect is the current shift and demand for different workers. This is important, as it will reshape the definition of work for the average American as well as workers worldwide. Second, this change of business practices will fundamentally change our views of how business is to be conducted and change consumer attitudes. Finally, I believe that a final effect of this system would be the introduction of deviance and corruption. Until recently, many business transactions were completed in the following manner using the following technologies: In person, over the phone, by e-mail. It has been just in years that people have had the ability to complete buying and selling transactions from the their workplace, home, car or even high up in the rocky mountains with just a few clicks of a button. The technology has made it very easy to accomplish what could have been a very time consuming, energy inefficient and possibly maddening experience to get business done. One very significant aspect of this efficiency has been the way stock market trading has become very popular. Traditionally, if a person was to invest their money on Wall Street, they had to call their Stock Broker and send them the money before the stocks could be purchased. As we all know the sweeping changes that take place at any particular time on the stock market can change drastically, often times changing the value of a stock from one minute to the next. Many a fortune has been lost due to stocks not being... ... the workplace. Or maybe it can result in more family time, or the pursuit of one’s hobbies and creative interests. It can save energy by not having to drive from mall to mall looking for the best prices. I can even say that I am not immune to the effects of on-line buying. By using a message post forum, I was able to locate a specific and rare car. The car was in Las Vegas. By using E-mail we were able to correspond for free. After a month of negotiation and detail clarification, the car arrived at my front door. This would not have been possible had it not been for on-line selling and buying. Works Cited Suzette Brooks and Ted Ruthizer Pg 18, USA Today, September 2014, Joshua Hyatt Pg 87, INC, October 2014, "Impact of eCommerce in Today’s Business World" Web 24 Apr. 2015. http://www.synaxiom.com/impact-of-ecommerce-in-todays-business-world/

Product of My Environment

Xavier Rodriguez Expos 101 Assignment # 3 F. D. Professor: Debra Keates 10/22/12 â€Å"What Means the World to You† What is important to someone varies from person to person. These things can be displayed in different forms and approached in various ways. This is seen within O’Brien, Stout and Fraser’s essays. O’Brien understands what inspires human connection and he manipulates the truth of his story in order to capture the attention and respect of others. He justifies his decision to distort his story based on the impact it has on the reader.For every author, O’Brien argues that the aim is to get one’s point(s) across; to bring attention to what matters the most to them. Regardless the category, this is done by expressing one’s objective with feeling and a sense of importance. In Caroline Fraser’s, â€Å"Rewilding North America,† she uses convincing evidence to prove to the reader that reserves and corridors promote the well-being of wildlife and humans alike. Similarly, Martha Stout has a biased opinion.Stout sets out to demonstrate to readers in â€Å"When I Woke Up on Tuesday Morning, It Was Friday† that counseling is important for clients who have experienced trauma by sharing individual client stories. The way people define truth and the information they provide can determine how others will evaluate the story. There are different ways to connect to a reader. The writer’s objective and the audience both influence these decisions. O’Brien’s storytelling method may involve embellishments that bend the truth rather than adhere to it.Had he authored either Fraser or Stout’s essays, the objective may have been the same, but the style would likely have been quite different. Within their respective essays, Fraser and Stout’s definitions of truth can be observed and interpreted. Both authors cite massive research projects, specific cases and general statistic s to communicate their theory. It would appear, that unlike O’Brien, both Fraser and Stout are more concerned with providing support for their story and/or objective. O’Brien did not bother with ensuring that his facts were correct, but rather that the message was clear.Facts and evidence, however, are very important components of Fraser and Stout’s â€Å"truths†. Fraser relies on scientific evidence to gain attention from her audience. While O’Brien may not disapprove of this method, he may see it as unnecessary. As she writes â€Å"In the United States, for example, deer-vehicle collisions alone occur up to one and a half million times each year, costing some two hundred lives and $8. 8billion annually; collisions also imperil the survival of twenty-one endangered and threatened species†(123).Another example of Fraser’s tendency to provide explicit scientific evidence is when she describes Fraser writes about the Banff Project scien tists and their impact on the concept of Rewilding as they collected â€Å"footage from cameras mounted on the underpasses [which show] bears and mountain lions approaching the wire cautiously, sniffing, and peering around† (123). The animals questioned the underpass at first, just as any creature would do when coming upon something unfamiliar. Shortly thereafter, â€Å"most of them burst over or under the wires, galloping off† (123).O’Brien would say that Fraser’s method of getting attention to her theory would be a great approach, however, if all that evidence is needed then his way to get through to people would not be relatable because to his own because he believes in simplicities and getting through to people with tantalizing and basic approaches such as emotions to capture the attention of people and his ability to tell a story and his way of articulating the facts or details. Regarding O’Brien’s argument that a piece of writing or a story should create an emotional connection, Fraser’s writing falls short.Fraser does make some attempts to build a feeling of empathy for the animals whose lives are positively impacted, as she writes â€Å"in 1993, Pluie lost her collar, which was found with a bullet hole in it. The wolf herself was shot dead two years later, along with her mate and several pups† (112). Even still as she integrates statistics and hard facts when she wrote â€Å"in the last 15 years or so, 27-percent of the known wolf deaths have been from the railway, and 60-percent were on the highway. Just 5-percent were natural†¦ The Bow Valley used to have three packs.Now it has one. In 1996, three of the four pups born to this pack were lost to the highway. The next year, none of the five pups born survived, and we know at least one was hit on the railway. During 1998, the pack had no pups and was down to three members† (112). In this segment, Fraser uses a specific story to draw in the reader and build a connection. However, these moments are too few and far between, as Fraser spends a good deal of the essay providing long descriptions of scientific theory and jargon relevant to her field.For example, Fraser spends five pages outlining the development of the term â€Å"ecosystem†, â€Å"equilibrium theory† and the consequent theory supporting the use of corridors and reserves, which she is generally supporting throughout her essay. Further she has a tendency to provide irrelevant and ridiculous amounts of detail, which loses the reader’s interest. For example, Fraser writes, â€Å"Conservation biology is a small world:† and she elaborates, â€Å"Michael Soule sat on the committee at the University of Michigan that supervised Newmark’s dissertation. The study percolated in Soule’s mind as went to his next job, at UC Santa Cruz.Sitting in his kitchen one day, Soule was talking to his friend Arne Naess, the Norwegian phi losopher who founded ‘deep ecology’†¦ † While these details may be an attempt to grab the reader’s attention, they have the opposite effect. O’Brien might describe Fraser’s approach as dry and fruitless. The author’s have various styles they attempt to use to get across to their audience, as is their technique. When compared to Fraser, Stout’s approach would be more favorable to O’Brien because there is less technicality used, less use of attempt to convince the reader that her topic of dissociation is fact and is somewhat curable.She uses interconnections to demonstrate her therapist to client bond. The method that she uses is relaxed and simple yet effective by exposing the way dissociation is triggered, and how it happens to everyone whether or not the individual realizes it or not. â€Å"Sometimes dissociation can occur when we are simply confused or frustrated or nervous, whether we recognize it or not† (S tout 384). After her clients get an understanding they begin to feel and get a better sense of the things that matter to them and are more important them by working to get a grasp on the things which are simpler to connect with.Stout convinces people that her evidence is true by walking through alongside her patients in defining lost memories and times and situations and fills in the gaps necessary in order to help her clients feel closure, happy( satisfaction) and free. Allowing them to function with a more clear mind. She sees the way people are deeper than what is seen on the surface and have the ability to do the same things as anyone else can. Stout says, â€Å"All human beings have the capacity to dissociate psychologically, though most of us are unaware of this, and consider â€Å"out of body† episodes to be far beyond the boundaries of our normal experience.In fact, dissociative experiences happen to everyone and most of these events are quite ordinary† (388). Due to dissociation being an occurrence that is not identified with ease, the majority of society does not recognize that we all in fact dissociate. When it comes to straightforwardness, a person can be sincere but not report the truth due to naivety or in order to try to get a deeper meaning. O’Brien states, â€Å"In any war story but especially a true one, it’s difficult to separate what happened from what seemed to happen† (71). The truth is not out in the open and is hidden. This in turn plays on the accuracy of an experience.When retelling an experience, the sequence of events has to be objective or have an unbiased view. Often unbiased or objective views can be lost. O’Brien uses the statement â€Å"true war story† throughout his essay. The use of the word â€Å"true† causes the essay to have a biased view Stout’s ability tot be effective and connect with the reader is kept at a strong tempo when she gives strong interesting and powersfl insights How effective is Stout at connecting with the reader? If she is effective, find an example of a time in which she is. In Stout’s essay, she writes how â€Å"we can go somewhere else.The part of consciousness that we nearly always conceive as the ‘self’ cannot be there for a few moments, for a few hours and in heinous circumstances for much longer† (p 388). Everyone has moments where they go somewhere else in their own heads to cope or protect themselves from a situation, being distracted by something, mentally escaping into a film at a movie theater, or getting lost in a day dream are all little examples of how ordinary and everyday individuals dissociate. Add something about use of language. How does O’Brien use language? How about Fraser? Stout? What might O’Brien think of their uses of language? Examples: O’Brien use metaphors? artsy, elaborate descriptions? Fraser: scientific language? dry at times? Stout: person al anecdotes? also vivid descriptions? † Both authors illustrate the problems that animals and humans face and the ways they go about coming to conclusions and solving situations and problems. The role that language plays in determining truth to O’Brien, is the studies and usage of the manmade effects have on animals and what gets into the minds of humans. Fraser and Stouts style of writing differ from O’Brien’s by one (Stout) using counseling and the other (Fraser) using convincing evidence.Stout uses counseling as a means to support her assessments of her clients individual case. As Fraser uses convincing evidence in order to support her promotion of resources and corridors as being beneficial to both animal and humas. Fraser motivates people to act In â€Å"Rewilding North America,† by writing about the development of the concept of rewilding, a conservation method designed to save species from extinction by restoring â€Å"connectivity† i n nature, â€Å"holding out the hope and promise that [through this project] humanity could heal the environmental damage that had already been done† (119).Her evidence is adequate proposed solution to a problem must be tangible and realistic. Rewilding encompasses both aspects exactly. Another reason why rewilding has a better chance for success is the fact that it is natural. The combination of these three aspects makes rewilding the favorable and more effective solution to eliminating animal suffering Animals roamed planet Earth for nearly 600 million years prior to the appearance of the genus Homo. During all that time, many creatures and species came and went. By and large they evolved, disappeared and became extinct all due to nature, geography, environment and natural events.Animal extinction is a natural process, but nonetheless the rate has heightened because of mans’ interaction with animals. Humans tend to cause our wild animal neighbors much more trouble th an they do to us, as each day we invade thousands of acres of their territories while destroying their homes. These crises occurring in nature beg for humans to do something to eliminate or lessen the foreseen calamities. Caroline Fraser, in the essay â€Å"Rewilding North America† provides what can be appreciated as a balance between the latter two potential solutions.She explains the concept of rewilding, a large-scale conservation method aimed to restore and provide connectivity between animals and humans. The idea of rewilding is a marriage between synthetic biology and interspecies empathy because it constructively encompasses aspects from both approaches. Rewilding is a feasible solution to eliminate animal suffering that is not only natural but also is a tangible and realistic one, in comparison to the ideas of stout and o’brien. Rewilding is an appropriate solution to the problem of species extinction because it is primarily a natural process.Rewilding, like mo st natural processes, does not affect animal’s lives in any significant negative way. Fraser writes about Banff Project scientists and their impact on the concept of Rewilding. They collected â€Å"footage from cameras mounted on the underpasses [which show] bears and mountain lions approaching the wire cautiously, sniffing, and peering around† (123). The animals questioned the underpass at first, just as any creature would do when coming upon something unfamiliar. Shortly thereafter, â€Å"most of them burst over or under the wires, galloping off† (123).O’Brien would say that Fraser’s method of getting attention to her theory would be a great approach, however, if all that evidence is needed then his way to get through to people would not be relateable because to his own because he believes in simplisties and getting through to people with tantalizing and basic approaches such as emotions to capture the attention of people and his ability to tell a story and his way of articulating the facts or details. One patient in particular, named Julia, is a successful producer of documentary films.As a child, Julia underwent child abuse and was skillfully able to remove herself from the horrific situations. The trauma Julia experienced as a child causes her to dissociate now as an adult yet, she carries her life as anyone else would. â€Å"I met her when I she was thirty-two, and an intellectual force to be reckoned with. A conversation with her reminds me of the New York Review of Books, except that she is funnier, and also a living breathing human being who wears amethyst jewelry to contrast with her electric auburn hair† (Stout 385).From the description given by Stout in her essay, Julia does not fit into the category that society has placed her in. She overrides the stereotypes and labels because she is not any different from what society perceives as â€Å"normal. † She is intelligent and successful; everything soci ety wants her to be but for some reason she is perceived otherwise. Patients like Julia commonly experience dissociation more severely because of the traumatic experiences they have been through. Why should someone who dissociates, and receives therapeutic assistance to confront their issues, be perceived in society as being different from someone who does not?Dissociation should not negatively categorize its victims, but rather serve as a common ground between people because all people dissociate. â€Å"We can go somewhere else. The part of consciousness that we nearly always conceive as the ‘self’ can not be there for a few moments, for a few hours, and in heinous circumstances, for much longer† (Stout 388). Everyone has moments where they go somewhere else in their own head to cope or protect themselves from a situation. Being distracted by something, mentally escaping into a film at a theatre, or getting lost in a day dream are all minuet examples of how ordi nary, everyday individuals dissociate.Dissociation is an obstacle that Stout’s patients encounter on a day to day basis, and, unfortunately, classifies them in society to be â€Å"abnormal. † Society has a picture of what â€Å"normal† is supposed to be; but what makes one individual more â€Å"normal† than the next? While Stout’s patients are looked upon negatively as being strange because they dissociate; they are no different from a man who enjoys a film at a theatre. â€Å"This perfectly ordinary man is dissociated from reality. Effectively, he is in a trance.We might label his perceptions as psychotic, except for the fact that when the movie is over, he will return to his usual mental status almost instantly. He will see the credits. He will notice that he has spilled some popcorn, although he will not remember doing so† (Stout 388). Someone who society would categorize as a â€Å"normal man,† experiences an example of what Stout ’s patients bear regularly. The film watcher is in no contrast with Julia, or any of Stout’s other patients; therefore, society has misinterpreted what is considered the norm.Stouts essay would be evaluated using o† brien’s definition of truth by agreeing in the wyas that there are many times that people allow their minds to drift and take over. Imagination is what O’Brien uses and the imagination of these characters are what allow them to face and deal with their traumatic experiences and allows them totake stances in their places that may or may not be realistic. She uses language by its literal form in human communication with her clients, talking and assessing what they lack and how they is a solution through language and rehearsal processes assist in one having an ability to adapt to normalisity.This is like o’briens as he is most effective with speaking and using language and mind as his tools to paint pictures to the stories he makes. These two are more natural and effective and simplistic yet powerful. When frasers compared to the authors approaches she takes more of a scientific stance as to where she provides evidence and actual facts from her discoveries. Stout says, â€Å"I believe that most of us cannot know what we would do, trapped in a situation that required such a seemingly no-win decision† (382).Stout’s patients are wrongfully perceived as â€Å"insane†, yet no one has bothered to put themselves in their position. Dissociation experienced at the caliber that Stout’s patients do, is normal to them. What society perceives as â€Å"normal,† and what Stout’s patients perceive as normal, is identical because Stout’s patients see themselves that way. Dissociative episodes are what they have been experiencing for most of their lives; therefore, it is what they see as the norm and society should not reprimand them for that. â€Å"A True war story is never mora l.It does not instruct, nor encourage virtue, nor suggest models of proper human behavior, nor restrain men from doing the things they have always done. If a story seems moral, do not believe it† (347). In short, it gives you a view of how to take in the war story. It differs from the usual happy and uplifting war story and gives a realist and somber approach to reading a war story. The following will explain the importance of this passage and how it relates to the short story. Reason why he wouldn’t agree with fraser. â€Å"True war stories do not generalise. They do not indulge in abstraction or analysis;.For example: war is hell. As a moral declaration the old truism seems perfectly true, and yet because it abstracts, because it generalizes, i can’t believe it with my stomach. Nothing turns inside. It comes down to gut instinct. A true war story, if told truly, makes the stomach believe† (O’Brien, p. 274). * In â€Å"Rewilding North America†, Fraser mentions a man named Harvey Locke, and how he said â€Å"I choose those words, ‘Yellowstone to Yukon,’ because they’re deep symbols in peoples brains. If I say those words in Stuggart, Germany, in Toronto, in new York, or in Tokyo, everybody knows what I’m talking about† (Fraser 121).He was talking about the title of his catch phrase because it would grab the attention of people who shared a common interest. He knew that there were people who would be interested in â€Å"Y2Y† because they shared a common concern that mattered to them when it involved rewilding animals. Similarly, in her essay, Martha Stout writes about a conversation she was having with a woman named â€Å"Julia† and how she had asked, â€Å"do other people remember those things, about their teachers, and going to their graduation, and learning to drive and so on? (Stout 387). Meaning the way other people think about situations that have occurred in their p asts. Things that were at some point so important, things that mattered to them, at least in those years of age and time. The process that pertains to what matters comes in all forms. In Fraser’s excerpt she was talking about the sciences and how the topic of concern would have the ability to bring awareness to her idea of restoration.There are other ways like in Stouts, she being the psychologist who works with clients, discusses and rehearses situations alongside her clients in order to recover what was supposed to be significant and have some level of importance at one stage in her client’s life. In these cases the process of restoration. There are unlimited topics of discussions which coincide with interpersonal relationships like the ones that Tim O’Brien attempts to establish by using war as the main topic, something that has long time been a concern of people.Something that he knows will draw people in and make them invest their time and feelings into wha t matters to him. However, each individual designs their stories from past and present experiences differently. There is a diverse level of severity and truth. Things that really happened and things that could have happened and how story tellers fill in those gaps, is completely up to their discretion. In â€Å"how to tell a true war story,† O’Brien writes, â€Å" you can tell a true war story by the questions you ask.Somebody tells a story, let’s say, and afterward you ask, ‘is it true? ’ and if the answer matters, then you’ve got your answer† (p276). In O’Brien’s story he writes a letter to his fallen friends relative. In it he goes into great detail that is both deep and disturbing. He mentions both the ways â€Å"Lemon† was a person he has deep love for and the gruesome ways his life ended. The truth came out towards the end after what mattered to him was not reciprocated by Lemons sister, which left a gap, a p lace of question to the person who leaves the questioner questioning.This then makes him give up in a sense, as if he were to break down which ironically is done mainly by his own accord because there was never a simple response to his letter of make believe. There are many things that happen in all our lives both good and bad and these things contribute to who we are, the ways we communicate and how we communicate, how we present ourselves and go about every day life. These things make us aim to make what matters to us a factor and a reality when it comes to achieving.What matters in each individuals life of course varies. There are times when what matters becomes something that is shared by many, creating a movement, like in Fraser’s Rewilding how there was a problem she assisted in shining light into the problem and successfully there was others who began to share the importance of restoring wildlife. In Marta Stout’s story creating an ability to connect the missing parts of her clients’ lives contributed to a better life. What mattered to her was helping her patients get a grip on their mental stabilities.Then there are some who some, when thought about can seem selfish because what matters to them is how they feel on account of others and in the process if others get left in question to fulfill what matters. In all the stories there was something of importance to the writer, something that mattered at some point enough to write about it. Sometimes those things are not relevant or seem to be when first thought about, but then many stories are designed to the knowledge of the person whose captivated your attention and sometimes afterward you might ask, ‘is it true? and if the answer matters, then you’ve got your answer† so O’Brien says. As long as the things that are being exchanged consist with a level of importance it does not matter how real or how fake it may be. What matters is the lessons learned, the com munication and the processes that go into exchanging. As long as you know what you believe and know, truth will always be left for your decision to what is and is not true.

Essay on Anti-War Sentiments in Cats Cradle and...

On the surface, Kurt Vonneguts Cats Cradle and Slaughterhouse Five are vastly dissimilar works of literature, each with its own creative style and plot. However, when the texts are examined with a discerning eye one can notice multiple thematic undercurrents such as war fate,time and suffering hidden in plain sight. Overwhelmingly common in Cats Cradle and Slaughterhouse Five are strong anti-war sentiments which show all the ways war is deleterious towards the human condition.(Marvin) Vonnegut shows how war only causes pointless suffering and destroys the human body through countless ironic deaths, including Edgar Derbys, who is shot for stealing a teapot shortly after hundreds of thousands are massacred in the Dresden fire bombings.†¦show more content†¦Another malignant effect of war is its toll on the human conscience; in Cats Cradle the owners of research institutions and the American government turn harmless scientific discoveries into weapons. Vonnegut points out that science preformed to advance academia and satisfy curiosity is all to often used for evil.(Mustazza) This point is driven home when we are introduced to the introverted Felix Hoenniker, who invented the atomic bomb and ice nine. The use of ice nine as a doomsday device in the story provides a view into Vonnegut himself, both his encompassing pessimism and loathing of war. Without a doubt, Vonnegut connects both the atomic bomb and ice nine by giving them the same fictional inventor and similar consequences of abuse. Furthrmore, by terminating the fictional world in Cats Cradle with ice nine, Vonnegut points out how its real-world allegory, the atomic bomb, may have the same result. According to critics both Cats Cradle and Slaughterhouse Five are anti-war books, but one is left to wonder why Vonnegut hates war so much. His view on lifes purpose provides a pretty clear answer for this question. He thinks that since life means nothing, people fight wars to accomplish nothing. The goal of war is to cause death and human suffering to accomplish end, but since that end means nothing, war is just cyclical violence. (Klinkowitz) InShow MoreRelatedKurt Vonnegut Analysis825 Words   |  4 PagesDecidedly anti-war, Vonnegut refused to glorify his most hurtful memories of World War II. His writings took on a common thread of sharp wit and satire. Hilariously, he made fun of his world and attempted to teach a lesson regarding society’s quirks and highlight what he thought about society. Born November 11, 1922 and raised by wealthy Germans in Indianapolis, Kurt Vonnegut, Jr’s family abandoned their German culture to prove their patriotism in view of the anti-German sentiment after World

Literature Reviews About El Tunel by Juan Pablo Castel

Introduction This book examines the issues that come about in relationships. In the book, El Tunnel, Juan Pablo Castel who is an artist by profession is attracted to the woman who came to admire some of his paintings at an art exhibit. The woman is incidentally married but Castel insists on introducing himself. She decides to disappear. Castel makes a follow up of the lady throughout the city and fails to track her on two occasions before he finally meets her. He develops interest in her despite learning that she is married to an old scholar. Castel is unable to overcome the obsession for the lady and his interest results in fate as the outcome is the killing of Mary. Main Discussion The story explains the consequences of touching and physical separation from the community that culminated in Castel murdering the person who he presumed to be able to understand him most in the whole world. Castel sees Maria entering an apartment that he believed was her place of work. He intends to track her and question her about the painting she had watched at the exhibition. In the process, he learns that her name is Maria. They part but promise to meet again. It is later found that Maria is married to a blind fellow called Allende and they live in the Posadas Street in the northern frontiers of the city. The continued interest in Maria by Castel is conquered by investigations of the life of Maria with her spouse, the reason for her not using her husband’s   last name, and her private thoughts. This makes her uneasy. As a result of this dissatisfaction, Cartel’s infatuated thoughts drive him to various sorts of unnecessary worries about his relationship he had believed they had developed for each other. The worry he has over their relationship is intensified when they pay a visit to Allende’s cousin Hunter. The observation that Castel make during the visit are not encouraging. He observes the presence and outlook of other incoming family and the overheard but not elaborate confrontation between Maria and Hunter .These observations force him to leave the ranch hoping that Maria would notice that he had left and follow him. She does not show up at the station which confirms his pessimistic attitude. He returns to Buenos Aires and writes a letter, condemning her of making love with Hunter, but later he rules upon sending to her. He tries to convince a postal employee to withdraw the actual letter but he does not succeed. He then comes to conclusion that it was meant to reach its recipient. On another occasion, Castel accesses Maria by phone during which she hesitantly accepts to meet him but promises him that their meeting will not be very pleasing and probably cause more mischief to him. She fails to show up at Buenos Aires and Castel concludes that she is a prostitute who does not only cheat on her husband with him but with other men like Hunter and other men. This shows the character of Castel as a dictator in their relationship with Maria as he does not consider the circumstances which lead to Maria not showing up. In a fit of anger, he awaits outdoor for visitors to exit the house. In the meantime, his nervousness developed to the extent where he feels that they are not in good relations in life in parallel pathways while his life is a solitary tunnel, in which all his stages of life are passing, all his youth, infancy and whole life. The theme of love and loneliness is clearly brought out in the story. This is contributed by the modern world’s effects on the life of Castel by substituting attributes of humankind he had with automation and separating him from people. Despite being dehumanized, he exhibits human attributes of being alone and he tries to conquer this by looking for unconditional love. His perception of love, nevertheless, is not giving anything away and he tries to show it by unaccepted mechanical techniques. These techniques involve loving Maria on account of apparent similarity, pestering her, creating fundamental speculations and taking into consideration unrealistic occurrences that may come out of them. Juan Pablo Castel resorts to love as the answer to his loneliness; nevertheless he does not have a realistic understanding of it. He does not have the knowledge of how to cope with the subsequent emotions, and he is self-centered and does not put into consideration its other partner’s perceptions. He assumes that love is only a one way process where one gets satisfaction on his side while the other partner does not. Maria is also perceived as loose in her love life because she spends most of her time with other men like Castel and Hunter more than she does with her husband, Allende. This culminates in Castel concluding that she is actually a prostitute and the consequence is the murder of her by Castel. Throughout the story she is less frequently with her husband as can be seen when she goes to exhibition of Cartel’s painting and Visits Hunter’s ranch. This is evidence that her love for her marital husband is not strong. Maria is also depicted as unable to control her desire for men .While going to visit her other man, Hunter at the ranch, she allows Castel to go along with her yet Castel is one of her male lovers. This results in Castel discovering that she was actually a prostitute who not only cheated on her husband with him, but also with other men like Hunter. Little did she know that this public display of affection would culminate to her own death. The theme of dehumanization of modern society is also clearly brought out. In the society where Castel lives, material needs are of little or of no concern. The advancement of technology has reached a point where fundamental needs are achieved and artistic, complicated self-awareness is the determining factor of human consciousness. Castel is found to be in this existentialism indecisiveness. His profession is painting dealing with artistic aspects of life and not realistic way of life. He can live as a person independent of the society. It can be concluded that the society and humankind are abhorrence to him. He perceives no human connection worth his consideration. Yet he expects some kind of human understanding from fellow human beings. This is what drives him into obsession with Maria. When Maria notices a window in one of his paintings, he concludes that he has found this relationship. The occurrence is odd but in the business, artificial world he dwells in it looks normal. All his expectations of nature of the world turn futile. On the other hand, the climax of the book that human interaction is both dehumanizing and deceitful. This is observed by Castel on Maria with the actions of unfaithfulness he feels when he discovers that she previously had a husband and a string of lovers. Finally the aspect of logic is clearly examined. In the book, logic is fundamental to Castel. Throughout the narration, Juan Pablo Castel, continuously tries to make any kind of decision in his day by day circumstances. His perception of life as being in existential leads him to apply a probabilistic technique to gauge the potential results for each of the decisions he makes that come his way. In consideration of all the decisions he has to make, he anticipates a variety of different scenarios which he has to overcome. In the occasions where the number of scenarios involved is three or four, Castel selects the one that offers less hurting to him. Occasionally, he decides not to pick, for instance, he made up his mind not to come close to Maria at the company, but to pass the time for a future occasion. In the process of not making a decision, novel arrays of challenges are presented to him. This characteristic may seem absurd but in actual sense, it is simply revealing the existentia list logic developed by Juan Castel towards his approach to life challenges. Works Cited Sabato, E. (2008). El Tunel: Novela Esenciales (Essential) Esenciales Series Esenciales (New York, N.Y.). New York: Harper Collins.